One of the reasons I started this blog was to show the lighter side of science. Usually, this means the silly side. But since Valentineās Day is on Wednesday, today weāre looking at the romantic side. And I probably wonāt even make more than one āgreat chemistryā joke, which is more than we can say for my labmatesā wedding reception. Today weāre looking at marriage proposals in scientific journals.
Statistical Mechanics
Rui Longās paperĀ from January is what inspired this post. Ā Refrigerators with finite cooling power are not exactly the most romantic topic ever. But you still hope a special someone might take a look at your paper. Or at least the acknowledgements. Because nothing is more exciting than thanking the funding agency! Well, except maybeā¦
āIn addition, Rui Long wants to thank, in particular, the patience, care and support from Panpan Mao over the passed years. Will you marry me?ā
Mao didnāt make Long wait for her response to make it through peer review. Which was yes, or we wouldnāt be talking about it. One would hope he knew it would be before proposing in a way that took ScienceTwitter by storm.
Paleontology
While looking for the above paper so I could link the reference, I came across another literature proposal. And while I could not have been more thrilled with my own marriage proposal, I have to admit āin a paper about discovering a new dinosaurā is also a pretty great proposal.
While the formatting of Longās paper put his proposal conveniently on the first page, Caleb BrownāsĀ was buried at the very end of his description of a new horned dinosaur. There were also a lot more people to thank before getting to the all important:
āC.M.B. would specifically like to highlight the ongoing and unwavering support of Lorna OāBrien. Lorna, will you marry me?ā
The editors were quite interested to hear the answer. After much consideration for how he was going to get OāBrien to notice the acknowledgement, Brown wound up showing it to her directly before the paper was actually released. Fortunately the answer was once again yes.